FreeBSD Port: bash-4.2.28

[Bryan Drewery]

On 8/3/2012 12:52 PM, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 04:17:57PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 7/25/2012 10:03 AM, Michael wrote:
>>> Any plans to update bash-4.2.28 up to patch level 037?
>>> I see we still are on patch level 028.
> 
> The Bash patches did not apply cleanly.

Works here.

# portsnap extract shells/bash
/usr/ports/shells/bash-completion/
/usr/ports/shells/bash-static/
/usr/ports/shells/bash/
/usr/ports/shells/bashc/
# cd /usr/ports/shells/bash
# fetch -o patch
'http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=170283&getpatch=1'
# patch -p0 < patch
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -ur ../bash.orig/Makefile ./Makefile
|--- ../bash.orig/Makefile      2012-05-07 10:12:41.000000000 -0500
|+++ ./Makefile 2012-07-30 15:14:26.000000000 -0500
--------------------------
Patching file ./Makefile using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 7.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -ur ../bash.orig/distinfo ./distinfo
|--- ../bash.orig/distinfo      2012-05-07 10:12:41.000000000 -0500
|+++ ./distinfo 2012-07-30 14:40:11.000000000 -0500
--------------------------
Patching file ./distinfo using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 56.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -ur ../bash.orig/files/xpatch-colonbreakswords
./files/xpatch-colonbreakswords
|--- ../bash.orig/files/xpatch-colonbreakswords 2012-01-12
16:32:28.000000000 -0600
|+++ ./files/xpatch-colonbreakswords    2012-07-30 15:08:22.000000000 -0500
--------------------------
Patching file ./files/xpatch-colonbreakswords using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 12.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 20.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 40.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 103.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 113.
done


>  
>> I've submitted a patch to update to 37.
>> It's attached to the PR ports/170283:
> 
> I'll take a look.  Thanks!
>