Time to kill php4, who stands up to save it?

Chris Rees utisoft at gmail.com
Tue Apr 10 06:43:40 UTC 2012


On 10 Apr 2012 04:50, "Cy Schubert" <Cy.Schubert at komquats.com> wrote:
>
> In message <20120409220442.GE90364 at azathoth.lan>, Baptiste Daroussin
writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Apparently we are still sheaping php4 and his friends, which is EOLed by
> > upstream since 2008.
> >
> > on the ports tree we have two consumer of php4, once which seems to be
able t
> > o
> > run with php5 according to upstream website and the second which
already have
> >  a
> > newer version using php5 in the ports tree.
> >
> > So if you really have reason to save php4, please stand up.
>
> I see no reason to keep php4.
>
> On a tangential issue, php52 should probably be kept around, at least for
> now.

The PHP maintainer disagreed on this point last week-ish.

Chris

> <Cy.Schubert at komquats.com>
> FreeBSD UNIX:  <cy at FreeBSD.org>   Web:  http://www.FreeBSD.org
>
>        The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list