sysutils/cfs

[Mikhail T.]

On 07.09.2011 03:09, perryh at pluto.rain.com wrote:
> So at this point, all that is needed is for someone interested in
> preserving the port -- like maybe you? -- to step up and_do_  that.

The main topic here -- despite the subject line -- is not about the 
particular part, but about the conflicting opinions on when to remove 
ports from the tree. The fate of sysutils/cfs or any other individual 
port is, really, secondary to that discussion...

Yar, myself, as well as other folks, who object to the on-going 
deprecations/removals of ports for the slightest of offenses, can fix 
/any/ port currently on the death-row, but we can not fix /all/ of them. 
Still, we would like them to remain in the tree -- unless they flat-out 
do not build.

Yours,

    -mi