[UPDATE] Re: Update on ports on 10.0

[Ruslan Mahmatkhanov]

Erwin Lansing wrote on 27.10.2011 14:21:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:44:34PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>>>>> What, on the other hand, makes sense is to have the fix that
>>>>> should include:
>>>>> a) a KNOB (WITH_FBSD10_FIX or similar),
>>>>> b) that only is run from bsd.port.mk when OSVERSION>1000000
>>>>> c) runs the latest version of the above patch.
>>>>> The KNOB's existence allow us to turn on the fix only for broken
>>>>> ports, and easily know what these broken ports are -- so we can
>>>>> poke maintainers from time to time about upstream fixes, ...
>>>>
>>
>> Erwin is currently running a build on i386-10 with this and the
>> following patches:
>> - bsd.port.mk patch from beat (based on ed@, jilles@ and stas@ patches)
>> - python patch from beat
>> - python patch from linimon
>> - WITH_FBSD10_FIX in:
>>          - textproc/expat2
>>          - devel/pcre
>>          - devel/libtool
>>          - audio/libogg
>> Results by Monday.
>>
>
> These patches have now been committed to the tree, notably with
> lang/python27 missing in the above list but was included as well.  There
> have been some proposals already and we can now incrementally improve
> the workaround and, more importantly, start fixing individual ports.  Please
> note that the patch tries to balance between being a general enough fix
> to make it easy to get a working system running while not just swiping
> the whole issue under the rug and forget about it until the next release
> cycle.  Make sure to send any fixes upstream to the hack can be removed
> from the ports again.
>
> Thanks for all your patience and thanks for all those involved,
> especially beat who sent many patches and improvements.
>
> Erwin

About devel/libtool fix. Why to not update it to 2.4.2 where this was 
fixed upstream? I mean http://bugs.freebsd.org/162012


-- 
Regards,
Ruslan

Tinderboxing kills... the drives.