[HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes
mexas at bristol.ac.uk
Thu Mar 24 16:41:37 UTC 2011
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 09:23:22AM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:38:48AM -0500, Eitan Adler thus spake:
> >>you can then build category based directories with symlinks to the main
> >>location based on what categories
> >My ports-mgmt/symports does something like this. It builds a full
> >directory tree of symlinks for the "secondary" categories.
> >>I'm sure that something like this has been mentioned before. But I don't
> >>what else is going to stop
> >>the categorization issue popping up all of the time.
> >If we alphabetized the ports then there would be constant conversation
> >about how whether or not we should categorize them.
> >Eitan Adler
> When this change goes in, it may be a good idea to commit a documentation
> change, as well, that cleans up and adds the new categories here:
I'm against this change. I've never had any problems
with the way ports are categorised.
Also, refuse file is arranged in categories,
so I can, and often do, remove the whole categories
of ports from my /usr/ports, e.g. languages which
I don't speak, or java, or whatever. Spending time
and energy on rearranging everything in alphabetic
order is a waste of time and will not help me
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944
Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423
More information about the freebsd-ports