2nd deprecation campaign

[Lang Hai]

On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:

> 2011/6/17 Lang Hai <freealson at gmail.com>:
>> 
>> On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:05 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> 
>>>> The depreciation is only for those ports that don't have public available distfiles right? So that I agree that broken ports should be excluded from this depreciation.
>>> 
>>> That is the way it is done, anyway there still could be some false
>>> positive having people to doulble check is always good :)
>> Agreed, but I just feel like these ports should not be in the depreciation list at the first place. That's my point my I could be wrong.
>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> So yes, always give people chance to fix ports, not remove them from the tree.
>>>> 
>>>> And, do we have a list of all maintainer-wanted ports, because that would be great if we have.
>>> Here you are :)
>>> http://www.freshports.org/search.php?stype=maintainer&method=exact&query=ports@FreeBSD.org
>>> 
>> What if we just put all un-maintained ports in this list instead of in the depreciation list?
> 
> They already are in this list :) That is this list I'm trying to cleanup
> 
Oh, sorry for my misunderstanding and I will try to see whether I can save some ports from that list.

>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Hai Lang
>>> 
>>> regards,
>>> Bapt
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Hai Lang_______________________________________________
>> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>> 
Regards,
Hai Lang