2nd deprecation campaign
freealson at gmail.com
Fri Jun 17 06:26:16 UTC 2011
On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> 2011/6/17 Lang Hai <freealson at gmail.com>:
>> On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:05 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>>> The depreciation is only for those ports that don't have public available distfiles right? So that I agree that broken ports should be excluded from this depreciation.
>>> That is the way it is done, anyway there still could be some false
>>> positive having people to doulble check is always good :)
>> Agreed, but I just feel like these ports should not be in the depreciation list at the first place. That's my point my I could be wrong.
>>>> So yes, always give people chance to fix ports, not remove them from the tree.
>>>> And, do we have a list of all maintainer-wanted ports, because that would be great if we have.
>>> Here you are :)
>> What if we just put all un-maintained ports in this list instead of in the depreciation list?
> They already are in this list :) That is this list I'm trying to cleanup
Oh, sorry for my misunderstanding and I will try to see whether I can save some ports from that list.
>>>> Hai Lang
>> Hai Lang_______________________________________________
>> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-ports