Which to bump for distfile location change?

[Peter Jeremy]

On 2011-Jul-26 17:03:24 -0400, Wesley Shields <wxs at atarininja.org> wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:08:13PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
>> No default package change, no portrevision bump. Leave it as is.
>
>Chris is right but I don't want to give people the impression that is
>the only time to bump PORTREVISION.

Another way of looking at it is:  Should a user who has the port
successfully installed rebuild the port, even though the distfile
version hasn't changed.

-- 
Peter Jeremy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20110727/47073bae/attachment.pgp