security/{nmap,zenmap} consolodation

Jason Hellenthal jhell at DataIX.net
Mon Jul 4 22:18:14 UTC 2011



On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 10:36:22PM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
> On 2011-07-04 16:48, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> > 
> > Hi ohauer@
> > 
> > I was curious if you would be intnerested in consolidating
> > security/zenmap into security/nmap with the options framework and
> > deprecating security/zenmap since it continually falls pretty far behind
> > newer versions of nmap in ports.
> > 
> > I am fairly sure that within the next couple days I could come up with a
> > prototype Makefile for this if you are interested or would like me to do
> > so but I don't want to put any time into it if this will not happen.
> > 
> > Let me know what you think.
> 
> I haven't touched zenmap because I don't use a gui on any of my FreeBSD
> machines (my gui replacement is parameter -oN / -oG and vi ;)
> Thats also the reason for me to keep the ports nmap/zenmap separate.

Understandable. ;)
> 
> If you have patches for zenmap or perhaps want to maintain zenmap I'm fine
> with it.

Some people have mentioned a slave port. Would you mind if that happened
?


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list