bump of PORTREVISION mandatory?

Henrik Brix Andersen brix at FreeBSD.org
Thu Jan 27 22:57:40 UTC 2011


On Jan 27, 2011, at 18:47, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> There is not need to bump PORTREVISION for simple changes.  The only
> time a PORTREVISION bump is required is when it fixes a security
> problem, or when a library the port depends on changes.

Not entirely true.

Please see http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.html#MAKEFILE-NAMING-REVEPOCH

Brix

-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen <brix at FreeBSD.org>



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20110127/f44e2adc/PGP.pgp


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list