diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso

Kurt Jaeger lists at opsec.eu
Tue Jan 4 16:27:56 UTC 2011


Hi!

Dima Panov write:
> jhell at dataix.net wrote:

> > Replace libiodbc with unixODBC
> >
> > They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC.

> Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features,
> exist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso.

Ah, interesting. What's the difference ? So a drive to
replace unixODBC in every port would be more useful ?

-- 
pi at opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                        10 years to go !


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list