diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
Kurt Jaeger
lists at opsec.eu
Tue Jan 4 16:27:56 UTC 2011
Hi!
Dima Panov write:
> jhell at dataix.net wrote:
> > Replace libiodbc with unixODBC
> >
> > They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC.
> Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features,
> exist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso.
Ah, interesting. What's the difference ? So a drive to
replace unixODBC in every port would be more useful ?
--
pi at opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 10 years to go !
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list