Plan to add a bsd.pure.mk

Zhihao Yuan lichray at gmail.com
Mon Dec 5 17:16:14 UTC 2011


No, we don't need it that to upgrade llvm, but I need to decide soon.

--
Zhihao Yuan
On Dec 5, 2011 10:16 AM, "Brooks Davis" <brooks at freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:28:33AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > I would like to hold off on any more disruptive changes to the tree
> > until we can get this release out the door.  If that means devel/clang
> > needs to stay at its current value (and only clang-devel updated), then
> > that's fine.
>
> We don't actually need to add a bsd.pure.mk to upgrade llvm.  We would
> need to complete the repocopy in ports/163030 and change the build and
> run depends in lang/pure which would change the depends of the 12ish
> ports involved.  Similar changes are needed in a couple other ports.
>
> I'll leave it up to portmgr to decide if that's too disruptive.  IMO if
> any change of this scope (an upgrade triggering less than dozen rebuilds,
> mostly of ports that aren't widely used) should be approved, it should
> be this one given our general toolchain focus.
>
> -- Brooks
>


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list