Why do we not mark vulnerable ports DEPRECATED?

[Xin LI]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 08/30/11 01:17, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 08/29/2011 23:25, Mark Linimon wrote:
>> So, the right answer may be "it depends".
> 
> I think my point is, it shouldn't. If a port is important/popular
> than it will be quickly fixed. If not, it goes away. Everyone
> wins.

Personally I do support this idea.

By the way vuxml is essentially a BROKEN if portaudit is installed.
Perhaps we should have that in base system or the build cluster?

Cheers,
- -- 
Xin LI <delphij at delphij.net>	https://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The Power to Serve!		Live free or die
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOXKFYAAoJEATO+BI/yjfBwkYH/2hDRqHEHztCDybJ4pE6u682
tURpASOWJgxkFn0xT1GF0VL9iwULWbboPdKVhWWPKAZiOWezJbepPeQv4Lcvbqqs
GB28I6DPyRIDES1eqAVJ9RbjP8LgUCTMBu2LU8YCkB1Zrbg9fXD5I0amEXaDTVoc
vBPM2uiWjx49/vgBRjSYKo2KG4MxOAt0PS+SlxXD5eeNodJmMLq8ipL6nA0ptA03
/l8ymf5wbNIWTmBm98CY1bIzxtVb1zcvkHPZRe4fPPXCFElrh6qCou09XJxoWg3P
sTaf6kIpCxTcPsKCdAipo5OvcnXh66Kn4hlKpvc3mKwYr5jMN69d9KqSaLw0HM4=
=02aU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----