How are [MAINTAINER] patches handled and why aren't PRs FIFO?
mfl-commissioner at marino.st
Wed Apr 27 19:18:39 UTC 2011
On 4/27/2011 8:55 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
> I honestly don't think that there's much wrong with the system as it
> is; once you get better at making submissions, taking time to read the
> Porter's Handbook your patches become committed more and more quickly.
Come on. There's no relationship between quality of the patch and when
it's picked up by a commiter. I ran my patch through tinderbox until
was right, and it's not like that made a difference. There is no way to
tell the quality without taking a real look.
There's plenty wrong with the current system. The real question is
what's the most practical way to address it.
More information about the freebsd-ports