Deprecation campaign
martinko
gamato at users.sf.net
Tue Apr 26 00:02:17 UTC 2011
Mark Linimon wrote:
> For those that want to see the state of all this, you can check out
> the following URL:
>
> http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portsconcordancefordeprecated.py
>
> In particular, the "interesting" entries for you may be the unmaintained
> ports (e.g. maintainer = "ports at FreeBSD.org".) In some of the other
> cases, the maintainer had already asked for the port to be deprecated
> (e.g. obsolete versions of databases/postgresql, dns/bind,
> emulators/linux_base, etc.)
>
> If you find that any of the ports on this list are ports that you use at
> your site, please consider taking them over as maintainer. This would
> help FreeBSD out.
>
> fwiw, an email version of this will go out on the 21st via a cronjob.
>
> Thanks.
>
> mcl
I understand you want to remove a port if it does not build and there is
no one (in long time) to fix it. However, deprecating because a dist
file moved, while port may be perfectly functional, seems a bit too
much, imho. I've just glanced at the list linked above and I've noticed
a few ports I've used in (not that distant) past. So I believe there
are still users of them out there. So why would we deny them using the
ports if all it takes is publishing the port files somewhere ? And
since FreeBSD has the infrastructure and resources I see no issue in
providing parking for such distfiles, especially if we believe they are
used by minority of users. Or is there something I miss here ?
With regards,
Martin
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list