m at micheas.net
Wed Apr 13 19:41:51 UTC 2011
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 20:33 -0700, Paul Pathiakis wrote:
> It has come to my attention that there is a port for OpenNMS in
> package form at this address:
> it is referenced from this link:
> Could the ports people please get this person on board to maintain the
> port and get it put into the distribution?
If you were to read over the old archives of this list, you
would discover that the maintainer of the opennms port has
serious reservations about putting it into the port tree because
as opennms is currently configured in 1.8 you can lose
historical data when you do an upgrade.
There is a bug filed against opennms upstream about this. This
same issue makes getting opennms into debian problematic as
I don't know the bug number off the top of my head.
> OpenNMS is fantastic. I've replaced multiple monitoring tools with
> this one. Please, please, please get this author involved to put it
> in the ports collection and maintain it.
The issue does not seem to be an issue with the port author not
being willing to maintain it. The problem is with a "bug" in
http://issues.opennms.org/browse/NMS-3541 is the issue that I
can come up with off the top of my head, I think there might be
a second issue.
I would expect opennms 1.9 to make it into the port tree.
Could make it into the ports tree.
> Thank you!
> Paul Pathiakis
> FreeBSD freak!
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
"I understand this is your first dead client," Sabian was saying. The
absurdity of the statement made me want to laugh but they don't call me
Deadpan Allie and lie.
-- Pat Cadigan, "Mindplayers"
More information about the freebsd-ports