kamikaze at bsdforen.de
Sat Sep 18 06:51:42 UTC 2010
On 18/09/2010 01:13, perryh at pluto.rain.com wrote:
> jhell <jhell at DataIX.net> wrote:
>> ... Mercurial being the distributed version control that it is
>> allows you to clone, make the changes you need to the clone test it
>> thoroughly and then either push or pull them to the main tree ...
> At the risk of starting the VCS variant of the vi vs emacs wars :)
> why Mercurial (rather than, say, GIT or SVK)?
> And no, I have nothing against Mercurial. I don't know _any_
> distributed VCS well enough to have an opinion of which would
> be best suited.
There is great documentation and re-education material
(for SVN users) out there for Mercurial.
But this is not going to happen any way. The ports are still stuck
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
More information about the freebsd-ports