Problem (again) with portsnap5.FreeBSD.org?
mad at madpilot.net
Thu Oct 21 18:14:06 UTC 2010
On 10/21/10 18:17, Royce Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:51 AM, RW<rwmaillists at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:31:24 +0200 Guido Falsi<mad at madpilot.net> wrote:
>>> I have noticed on the machines I use/administer a bias towards
>> If you define a cache environment variable the random choice is seeded
>> by that to improve the caching. There may also be some weighting in the
>> SRV record.
> Yep - update5 is currently weighted 50% in the SRV:
> $ host -t srv _http._tcp.update.freebsd.org
> _http._tcp.update.freebsd.org has SRV record 1 35 80 update4.FreeBSD.org.
> _http._tcp.update.freebsd.org has SRV record 1 50 80 update5.FreeBSD.org.
> _http._tcp.update.freebsd.org has SRV record 1 5 80 update3.FreeBSD.org.
> _http._tcp.update.freebsd.org has SRV record 1 10 80 update2.FreeBSD.org.
Thank you. This explains what I was seeing and makes it in fact quite
Guido Falsi <mad at madpilot.net>
More information about the freebsd-ports