GSoC: Making ports work with clang
dimitry at andric.com
Mon May 3 12:38:32 UTC 2010
On 2010-05-03 13:19, "C. Bergström" wrote:
>> Of course it does. It forces you to make your software portable.
> and your point is?
> Are you trying to say that s/building/porting/ between compilers is
> going to magically make the software (have less bugs, more performance
> or better robustness)
No, it gives you the choice of which compiler to use.
> Porting could be a means-to-an-end, but still
> it's not an end goal.. I'm digging at what's the end goal.. After it's
> all ported what magically happens?
You can then switch compilers freely, or at least, without too much
More information about the freebsd-ports