graphics/dri fails to build.

Garrett Cooper yanefbsd at
Sun May 2 20:21:04 UTC 2010

On May 2, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Robert Noland wrote:

> On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 11:46 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On May 2, 2010, at 5:30 AM, Robert Noland <rnoland at> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2010-05-02 at 11:26 +0200, Demelier David wrote:
>>>> It seems adding CFLAGS+=-march-=native solved the problem but I  
>>>> don't want to
>>>> keep this flag everytime in my make.conf
>>>> How this flag could solve the problem ? I can't understand.
>>> This actually stems from libdrm.  Intel requires certain atomics that
>>> are not available on pure i386.  They are present in code built for  
>>> i486
>>> +.  The default cpu was changed to i486 some time .
>> Should the port be marked broken with -march=i386 then?
> Well, I'm not sure quite how we would do that... but if your
> kernel/world is not really old, it should just work unless you force gcc
> to produce code that will run on i386.

	Something like this?

.if ${CPUTYPE} == i386 || ${ARCH} == i386 && ${CPUTYPE} == native
BROKEN  := this port requires i486+ CPU support

	Can't protect against someone using the non-supported means of compiling things and putting -m{arch,cpu,tune}=native in CFLAGS, et all.

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list