[RFC] Reduce namespace pollution on zlib.h
gahr at gahr.ch
Wed Mar 31 11:31:23 UTC 2010
On 2010-Mar-31, 03:41, Xin LI wrote:
> I will merge an upstream change from zlib, which basically unexpose LFS
> stuff on FreeBSD, and I plan to keep the off_t bits == 64. However, I would
> highly recommend ports maintainers to push upstream fix for LFS64 definition
> removal since they are wrong on FreeBSD
Sounds great, thanks!
> On Mar 31, 2010 3:30 AM, "Pietro Cerutti" <gahr at gahr.ch> wrote:
> On 2010-Mar-27, 02:51, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > Xin LI <delphij at delphij.net> writes:
> > > So... ...
> Just to make it clear so that everyone knows how we're going to handle
> this: are you (src people) going to commit a fix to unexpose LFS crap
> or are we (ports people) supposed to fix each and every single port
> that supposes to be on Linux?
> The attentive reader will note a bias towards the former :)
> Pietro Cerutti
> The FreeBSD Project
> gahr at FreeBSD.org
> PGP Public Key:
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
The FreeBSD Project
gahr at FreeBSD.org
PGP Public Key:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20100331/bdc5fc4d/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-ports