[Call for Testing] X.org 7.5 for FreeBSD

Jerry gesbbb at yahoo.com
Sat Mar 20 16:06:42 UTC 2010

On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:12:43 +0100
Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn at freenet.de> articulated:

>On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:54:28 -0400
>Jerry <gesbbb at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:26:03 +0100
>> Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn at freenet.de> articulated:
>> >Of course, this is just a hack and doesn't fix the real problem and
>> >we're probably all getting tired of this thread :)
>> Not half as tired as you will be if this port is officially released
>> and it breaks someone's system. If it comes down to fix it now or
>> fix it later, which do you think would be the more beneficial
>> scenario?
>Fix it now, of course.  But right now it isn't even clear what the
>cause of the problem is, so a real fix isn't possible.
>Gary Jennejohn

A real fix is possible, although it is true that the first order of
business is to discover what is causing the problem. Discontinuing one
threat and starting another that deals with the same problem hardly
seems productive. However, it makes no discernible difference to me.

By the way Gary, your "sig delimiter" is broken.

gesbbb at yahoo.com

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.

The bland leadeth the bland and they both shall fall into the kitsch.

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list