Direct or indirect libdependencies (using the libintl.so.8 case)
Alexander at Leidinger.net
Tue Jun 8 12:32:07 UTC 2010
Quoting Alex Dupre <ale at FreeBSD.org> (from Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:06:51 +0200):
> Alexander Leidinger ha scritto:
>> Now the number of people which know about it is bigger. Time will tell
>> if the subset of people which do something about it is non-empty now...
> I think the first step could be to run a tinderbox build with a patched
> libtool and see if anything break. Then, if the patch is simple, we
> could add a target to patch ports using bundled libtool and see again if
> anything break on tinderbox. What do you think?
I found some message I exchanged on the libtool list regarding this in
2007. I do not know the current state (libtool 2.2.6b) of this, but
someone with a little bit of time can check via the testcase which is
described in the mail at:
When this testcase does not rise a problem, your approach sounds good.
By the time they had diminished from 50 to 8, the other dwarves began
to suspect "Hungry" ...
-- Gary Larson, "The Far Side"
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
More information about the freebsd-ports