dspam install

[David DEMELIER]

2010/7/14 Jim Pazarena <fports at paz.bz>:
> Sahil Tandon wrote:
>>
>> [mail/dspam maintainer Cc:'d]
>>
>> On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 09:46:04 +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
>>
>>> 2010/7/13 Sahil Tandon <sahil at freebsd.org>:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 21:28:56 +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes sometime I'm nasty with people, I'm sorry about that but when I
>>> saw this port I just didn't understand.
>>
>> What did you not understand?
>>
>>> I apologize for my english.
>>
>> No apology needed, as that is not the problem here.
>
> my own ports confusion (in general) is that in some ports
> you use a "-Dxxxxxx" to define a required (or not required) option
> while in others (at least dspam) you use WITHOUT_xxx or WITH_xxx=1.
> It would be nice if all ports has the same standard of definitions.
>
> Or... am I confused?

If FreeBSD people agree, KNOBS will be removed in the future (but this
will take a long long time).

-- 
Demelier David