Question about pkg-plist

[david fries]

Thanks!

I'll go for the second variant then since the LICENSE is installed
regardless of NOPORTDOCS.

On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 22:04 +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:27:53 +0100
> david fries <djf at gmx.ch> wrote:
> 
> > Hello everybody
> > 
> > I'm currently working on a tiny little port. It consists of a single
> > binary and an accompanying LICENSE file. When I ran genplist, it
> > generated this in pkg-plist.new:
> > 
> > bin/mybinary
> > %%PORTDOCS%%%%DOCSDIR%%/LICENSE
> > %%PORTDOCS%%@dirrm %%DOCSDIR%%
> > 
> > Simple enough. However, I also know that the LICENSE file will also be
> > installed if NOPORTDOCS has been defined. I thought maybe I should
> > write something like this. 
> > 
> > bin/mybinary
> > %%DOCSDIR%%/LICENSE
> > @dirrm %%DOCSDIR%%
> 
> If you install the LICENCE file depending on NOPORTDOCS, the you should
> keep the first variant; if not, the second. First is what you should do.
> 
>