patch upgrade for port committers?
itetcu at FreeBSD.org
Fri Jan 29 13:47:40 UTC 2010
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 07:38:40 -0600
Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen at missouri.edu> wrote:
> Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:01:44 -0600 (CST)
> > Stephen Montgomery-Smith<stephen at missouri.edu> wrote:
> >> Also, I have taken to using shar files instead of diff's when
> >> creating new files.
> > Don't please, it makes committer's work harder.
> > And update to a port should be a diff. Preferably a cvs diff -u.
> I am thinking of something like this:
> I separated the diff and the shar files - diff for what is already
> existing, and shar for new files.
> Are you saying that you would prefer if I had done a single diff with
> "diff -urN"?
I would prefer this:
> Part of the reason I started to do this is because, even when I had
> clear messages like "there are new files XXX and YYY" they would
> still get forgotten by committers.
Yes, we're all only humans.
A single diff for me means:
pcvs ci portname
Anything else means more.
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> itetcu at FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20100129/171a06fd/signature.pgp
More information about the freebsd-ports