ports/142880: [REPOCOPY] chinese/stardict2-dict-zh_CN ---
wenheping at gmail.com
Tue Jan 19 02:01:36 UTC 2010
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Max Brazhnikov <makc at freebsd.org> wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR ports/142880; it has been noted by
> From: Max Brazhnikov <makc at freebsd.org>
> To: bug-followup at freebsd.org, jupengfei at gmail.com, wen at freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: ports/142880: [REPOCOPY] chinese/stardict2-dict-zh_CN ---
> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:22:50 +0300
> Content-Type: Text/Plain;
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> What the reason to have the same dictionaries under different ports?
Yes, it is the same dictionary. After rethinking of it ， now I think it is
unneeded to create a new port for stardict3-dict-zh_CN.
> Wouldn 't=20 better to remove run dependency on stardict and allow people
> to use existing port for any of stardict 2/3 (or other -- not only stardict
> can use these dictionaries.)
Yes, it is better than to create a new port. :)
But how do you think about this way:
1 REPOCOPY stardict2-dict-zh_CN--> stardict-dict-zh_CN
2 Add option entry for stardict2 or stardict3 ?
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
> Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the freebsd-ports