make package for ports, general question
itetcu at FreeBSD.org
Thu Feb 25 07:52:26 UTC 2010
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:25:06 -0800
Jason <jhelfman at e-e.com> wrote:
[ .. ]
> That being said, I ran into an item today that had me perplexed.
> Basically, it comes down to this:
> Why is it that "make package" doesn't include the execution
> instructions noted in the Makefile. To me, with my new knowledge of
> the ports system, seems like double the work for development and
> maintaining a port and package. I'm not just speaking for someone
> that maintains internal ports, but the many developers that maintain
> ports in the official ports tree for FreeBSD.
[ .. ]
What exactly doesn't work for you? Are you talking about pkg-message?
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> itetcu at FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20100225/e63379d2/signature.pgp
More information about the freebsd-ports