dougb at FreeBSD.org
Mon Dec 13 19:22:30 UTC 2010
On 12/13/2010 08:06, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:12:39 +0200 Ion-Mihai Tetcu<itetcu at FreeBSD.org>
>> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:31:25 +0100
>> Alexander Leidinger<Alexander at Leidinger.net> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 23:23:51 +0200 Ion-Mihai Tetcu
>>> <itetcu at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 21:54:31 +0100
>>>> Paweł Pękala<c0rn at o2.pl> wrote:
>>>>> docbook2pdf is part of textproc/docbook-utils so now we have all
>>>>> dependencies correctly set.
>>>> Yes, but we don't want them ;)
>>> *Some* people do not want them, so it should be configurable (with
>>> the default for at least the official package build cluster to be
>> Can't we just fetch the file as DSITFILES from somewhere?
> Do you want to invest time to build the port + manual, make the manual
> available somewhere, and modify the port each time to fetch it?
> What's wrong with having it build on the pointyhat cluster for those
> which build a package and to make it an option for those which build
> the port?
I think some ports have split the docs into their own port, e.g., gimp.
Is that a reasonable approach here? The fact that a lot of the gnome
stuff A) makes docs by default, B) with no option to turn it off, which
C) pulls in a ton of docbook and other deps; is not something I'm fond
of, and would prefer to not see repeated elsewhere. :)
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
More information about the freebsd-ports