problem with building /usr/ports/java/jdk16 in 'nohup' mode

Lowell Gilbert freebsd-ports-local at be-well.ilk.org
Sat Oct 17 14:55:17 UTC 2009


Matthias Apitz <guru at unixarea.de> writes:

> Hello,
>
> If you build the port /usr/ports/java/jdk16 in 'nohup' mode it loops
> later in the question about the license:
>
> ===>  Extracting for jdk-1.6.0.3p4_12
> => MD5 Checksum OK for jdk-6u3-fcs-src-b05-jrl-24_sep_2007.jar.
> => SHA256 Checksum OK for jdk-6u3-fcs-src-b05-jrl-24_sep_2007.jar.
> => MD5 Checksum OK for jdk-6u3-fcs-bin-b05-jrl-24_sep_2007.jar.
> => SHA256 Checksum OK for jdk-6u3-fcs-bin-b05-jrl-24_sep_2007.jar.
> => MD5 Checksum OK for
> jdk-6u3-fcs-mozilla_headers-b05-unix-24_sep_2007.jar.
> => SHA256 Checksum OK for
> jdk-6u3-fcs-mozilla_headers-b05-unix-24_sep_2007.jar.
> => MD5 Checksum OK for bsd-jdk16-patches-4.tar.bz2.
> => SHA256 Checksum OK for bsd-jdk16-patches-4.tar.bz2.
> => MD5 Checksum OK for tzupdater-1_3_18-2009k.zip.
> => SHA256 Checksum OK for tzupdater-1_3_18-2009k.zip.
> ===>   jdk-1.6.0.3p4_12 depends on executable: unzip - found
> /bin/sh /usr/ports/java/jdk16/files/license.sh
> JAVA RESEARCH LICENSE
> Version 1.6
>
>
> I.    DEFINITIONS.
> ....
> Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no]
>
> Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no]
>
> Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no]
>
> Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no]
> ...
> until file syste is full :-(
>
> The script /usr/ports/java/jdk16/files/license.sh should be changed to
> check if STDIN is a terminal, and if not should assume 'yes'.

Because of the way the license is written, I think it would have to
assume 'no'.


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list