HEADS UP multi processor compilations for everyone

Pav Lucistnik pav at FreeBSD.org
Wed Mar 25 09:41:49 PDT 2009

Dmitry Marakasov píše v st 25. 03. 2009 v 19:36 +0300:
> * Pav Lucistnik (pav at FreeBSD.org) wrote:
> Great, that was just about time.
> My question is whenther that would be enabled on pointyhat. I fear
> that error logs may become far less readable with output from
> multiple commands mixed together.

pointyhat observes the same rules and conditions as the end user, for
obvious reasons. So ports marked 'safe' will be parallelized, others
will not.

Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
              <pav at FreeBSD.org>

It's the classic Microsoft security-bulletin formula: "The vulnerability
is important (never dangerous); you have nothing to fear and no reason
to regret trusting us; we have no intention of apologizing for it or
even explaining it adequately; now go get your patch, shut up, and be
grateful nothing bad has happened.
  -- The Register
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20090325/0a5edfc1/attachment.pgp

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list