[RFC] New category proposal, i18n

[Thomas Abthorpe]

Friday will be one week for the topic, at which point I will take on
the next leg of the battle, which is making the pitch to portmgr.

Thomas

On 25/06/2009, Mark Foster <mark at foster.cc> wrote:
> perryh at pluto.rain.com wrote:
>>>> If i18n is too cryptic or too alphanumeric, and
>>>> internationalization is too long, why not go with "nls"?
>>>>
>>> I personally think that nls is equally as cryptic as i18n or l10n.
>>>
>>
>> Anyone care for "intlzn"?  It's short, should still tab-complete
>> from "in", and it may be a bit less cryptic than nls, i18n, or l10n.
>>
> If I may be so bold as to present a democratic outcome.
> To help settle the matter please vote on this issue within 48 hours.
> <http://www.micropoll.com/akira/mpview/615850-178803>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device


Thomas Abthorpe, FreeBSD Ports Committer
tabthorpe at FreeBSD.org, http://people.freebsd.org/~tabthorpe