Why not use normal CONFLICTS in lang/gcc43 instead of custom?

[Jeremy Messenger]

On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:54:18 -0500, Alex Dupre <ale at freebsd.org> wrote:

>> Using the full path will not work too well either with different  
>> LOCALBASEs
>> though I guess one could check /usr/local, $PREFIX, and $LOCALBASE and
>> consider that good enough.
>
> I think ${LOCALBASE}/bin/gcc295 would be enough. As you say, gcc295 is  
> dying, while ccache is actively used. It's quite annoying to remove such  
> check from the Makefile, while I doubt anyone is still going to compile  
> gcc43 with gcc295 installed in a non-standard location.

Yes, I agree about that ${LOCALBASE}. Either put full path or remove  
gcc295 sound good to me.

Cheers,
Mezz


-- 
mezz7 at cox.net  -  mezz at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/  -  gnome at FreeBSD.org