this time it's vim/distfiles

Wesley Shields wxs at FreeBSD.org
Wed Jul 29 13:57:54 UTC 2009


On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 08:05:20AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
>      When portmaster tries to rebuild vim-lite, it tries to verify the
> checksums of 239 (?) patches.  (I guess I should take that as a warning.)
> Unfortunately, one of them apparently doesn't check out properly.  Here's
> an excerpt of the portmaster output.
> 
> => MD5 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.040
> => SHA256 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.040.
> => No MD5 checksum recorded for vim/7.2.041^.
> => No SHA256 checksum recorded for vim/7.2.041^.
> => No suitable checksum found for vim/7.2.041^.
> => MD5 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.042.
> => SHA256 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.042.
>      .
>      .
>      .
> => MD5 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.239.
> => SHA256 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.239.
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop in /usr/ports/editors/vim-lite.
> 
> ===>>> make failed for editors/vim-lite
> ===>>> Aborting update
> 
> ===>>> Update for vim-lite-7.2.209 failed
> ===>>> Aborting update
> 
>      I looked in distfiles and found that the line in question apparently
> had an extraneous character that displays in less and vi as a percent sign.
> 
> DISTFILE:vim/7.2.040:SIZE=1836:SHA256=ad320d45c2541a767b351fdb8720c349c468acec8cf54dcfced0a6d1e58e5d8e:MD5=4c493255ae227498016f30a0002ec1cc
> DISTFILE:vim/7.2.041%:SIZE=22405:SHA256=2f48e173df3d306edd982f8a3d5a15c65ba19694ca32bdbdaa51f8bcc48a3d06:MD5=107ba5dccb1df727601aead37abf8cd3
> DISTFILE:vim/7.2.042:SIZE=4987:SHA256=d5fa884a7c5ee77b60fe512ceccaac640c0dfc00bd435211f4e4597ae3bee2cd:MD5=99baedef8a9c908774b7ed74deacf184
> 
> I tried deleting the extra character and rerunning portmaster, but that just
> yields the same results.

Don't just delete it. Change it to a ^ and you should be OK until the
maintainer updates distinfo to reflect the recent change.

-- WXS


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list