can you PLEASE _read_ the QAT mails? (was: Re: Question about a failure report)

[Ion-Mihai Tetcu]

On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 13:49:49 -0500
Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists at tx.rr.com> wrote:

> > For short, your port's configure script fails to search for mysql
> > headers in the right place; QATty has LOCALBASE and PREFIX set
> > to /usr/PPP. If you can't sorted out in a few days drop me an email
> > and I'll take a look.  
> 
> No offense taken.  The thing that confused me is that I always build
> my ports in /tmp/portname when testing, but barnyard still managed to
> find mysql headers when building. 

Yes, that's PREFIX (ie. you install in /tmp/portname) but LOCALBASE I
bet it's /usr/local.

> So I didn't understand why it was failing in QAT.  I followed all the
> links in the email and read the materials, but I still didn't
> understand why the build failed in QAT.  

It failed on QATty, not on QAT.

QAT has -DNOPORT* while
QATty has PREFIX and LOCALBASE = /usr/PPP

> I didn't want to make a change to the port unless the problem really
> was with the port. That's why I asked the question.

It is :) Sahil's patch looks good, I'm going to test it tomorrow.

-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> itetcu at FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20090705/2312fdd9/signature.pgp