STILL OPEN: ports/129226: update devel/boost from 1.34.1 to 1.37

Pav Lucistnik pav at FreeBSD.org
Sun Jan 11 11:20:32 PST 2009


Alexander Churanov píše v ne 11. 01. 2009 v 21:38 +0300:
> 2009/1/11 Pav Lucistnik <pav at freebsd.org>
>         
>         That's certainly a possibility -- but can two boost versions
>         coexist in
>         a single system?
> 
> 
> That's a real problem. To my mind there are no problems for shared
> libraries, but for header files the suggested solution would require
> placing headers under /usr/local/include/boost-134/boost and modify
> all ports' build processes to include /usr/local/include/boost-134 in
> a search path.
> 
> I'll carry out this experiment.

Let's see if there's an easy way to make all the ports respect it, say,
if it would mean just modifying pkg-config output. If it's non-trivial,
we'll have to go with two conflicting ports.

I want to run an experimental package build with new boost, to see how
many ports will still need the old one. Is the patch on rapidshare
(ports/129241) still valid? Or is there a new patch you want to send me?

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
              <pav at FreeBSD.org>
One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring
them all and in the zone to bind them.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20090111/344a41c5/attachment.pgp


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list