BIND poisoning??
Albert Thiel
athiel at yourdatacenter.com
Fri Jan 9 03:07:05 PST 2009
Thanks very much.
Both of you were a great help to us all. As I tell everyone I deal with,
FreeBSD is the best in all ways, this included.
I have secured my servers with the workaround for the moment and will update
fully shortly. -Al
Albert Thiel
athiel at yourdatacenter.com
Your Data Center & HostLongIsland.com
Powerful FREE ISP Tools, Mail & Website Hosting
http://www.YourDataCenter.com
Hewlett, New York
(877)302-8642
-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Barton [mailto:dougb at FreeBSD.org]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 3:36 AM
To: matt donovan
Cc: Albert Thiel; freebsd-ports at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: BIND poisoning??
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, matt donovan wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Albert Thiel
<athiel at yourdatacenter.com>wrote:
>
>> Whoever manages BIND..
>>
>> SANS has a new warning/listing on BIND (Jan 7th) that may effect
>> FreeBSD's implementation, but I am not sure... I'm just the mailman
>> here :)
>>
>> http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5641&rss
As I've said several times now, you need to look at
https://www.isc.org/node/373 to get the full picture. This issue is only
relevant for you if you are using DNSSEC to verify signatures.
> well the security team already knows I sent them some research I did and
yes
> the maintainer for the bind port knows as well I m just waiting back for a
> reply from him. to see if he'll update the port or not.
I both updated the ports and responded to you yesterday.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list