git snapshots, PORTVERSION, PORTEPOCH
Ion-Mihai Tetcu
itetcu at FreeBSD.org
Sat Feb 21 00:45:09 PST 2009
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:32:52 +0300
Anonymous <swell.k at gmail.com> wrote:
> Would it be okay if I use commit hash in PORTVERSION and constantly
> bump PORTEPOCH on each update? Are there any such precedents?
>
> %%%
> PORTVERSION= 0.0.10${SNAPSUFFIX}
> PORTEPOCH= 1
>
> SNAPSUFFIX= .${SNAPTYPE}.${SNAPREV}
> SNAPTYPE= git
> SNAPREV= e09f50e
> %%%
>
> Where PKGNAME would look like
>
> myport-0.0.10.git.e09f50e,1
>
> I want to keep commit reference in place and refrain from using vague
> dates in PORTVERSION because there can be several commits per day. And
> for curious users I can include ChangeLog file in distfile generated
> from git-log command.
No, please don't do this. We use PORTEPOCH when there's no other way.
Use, like other ports do:
PORTVERSION= 0.0.10
PORTREVISION= ${SNAPDATE}
I don't see what role SNAPTYPE would have.
Since you have the date, you can easily get the git magic string.
--
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> itetcu at FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20090221/0f0440e1/signature.pgp
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list