always-interactive ports
Andrew D
andrewd at webzone.net.au
Mon Nov 24 04:24:24 PST 2008
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> I wonder if we have any flag for always-interactive ports i.e. ports
> that prompt user for something regardless of all batch/interactivity
> options. One example is java/jdk* ports that prompt user for license
> acceptance.
>
You will probably find this is for legal reasons.
> If we don't have such a flag, maybe we should add one.
>
> One use, for instance, is to skip such ports for portupgrade --batch.
>
Doing this could make fBSD liable which we certainly don't want.
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list