How to post good follow-ups to bug-followup@ ?
freebsd-listen at fabiankeil.de
Sun Jul 20 16:22:33 UTC 2008
Shaun Amott <shaun at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 06:46:27AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 07:13:04PM +0530, Ashish Shukla ???????????? ??????????????? wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > So either encoding them so they do get properly decoded, or ensuring
> > > > that they remain as-is (no MIME encoding or claims of same) should do
> > > > the trick. I think I'd be more inclined toward the latter approach, if
> > > > possible.
> > >
> > > You mean, no quoted-printable attachments, but using 7bit
> > > Content-Transfer-Encoding instead, hmm...?
> > I suspect that Fabian Keil's suggestion that the Web interface might
> > have trouble with signed messages may well be on the mark.
> Signed messages shouldn't be a problem in principle, but that message
> looks sufficiently dodgy to confuse the simplistic parser. The quoted
> printable header also isn't caught, so the attachment doesn't get
> decoded either.
Are you aware of PRs with signed messages that are displayed properly?
> I'll take a look when I get a chance... I've got some other (related)
> fixes due too.
Great. Just in case you need more samples,
here's another one that's displayed incorrectly:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20080720/43011e59/signature.pgp
More information about the freebsd-ports