ports/124985: [patch] devel/dmucs unbreak on 64bits archs

[Max Khon]

Hello!

Pietro Cerutti wrote:

> | On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:34:54PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> |> I definitely do not agree. Please note that a pointer is not required to
> |> fit into a long, while it is required to fit into a size_t.
> | I do not think that C99 requires the size_t to be capable of holding
> | the pointer. size_t is only required to hold result of sizeof.
> 
> size_t is required to be of rank equal to or greater than any other
> object you can create from within the C language. This implies that it
> can (i.e., it is required to be able to) hold a pointer type.

Does it? http://bytes.com/forum/thread735346.html

/fjoe