[PROPOSAL] Ports using SCM repositories as source instead of
distfiles
Jeremy Messenger
mezz7 at cox.net
Wed Dec 17 15:01:22 PST 2008
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:47:56 -0600, Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3 at amdmi3.ru>
wrote:
> * Garrett Cooper (yanefbsd at gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> > It's useful for me too sometimes, but it's already not 100% reliable,
>> > as some ports still generate it dynamically, some use PLIST_FILES,
>> some
>> > use PLIST_SUB so it's not apparent under which path and/or name the
>> file
>> > mentioned in plist is actually installed.
>> Getting rid of the plist files will force a major rewrite of
>> pkg_install. Are you really comfortable doing that :\?
>
> Not getting rid but generating automatically. Many ports already
> have no pkg-plist.
I mean by keep static pkg-plist (not get rid of it). I don't like dynamic
plist. I do not need to list my reasons as it's already in the archives by
someone and maybe me (not remember).
Cheers,
Mezz
--
mezz7 at cox.net - mezz at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome at FreeBSD.org
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list