Gnash 0.8.1 submitted
Milan Obuch
freebsd-ports at dino.sk
Tue Sep 25 13:37:18 PDT 2007
On Tuesday 25 September 2007 22:28:58 Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * Milan Obuch (freebsd-ports at dino.sk) wrote:
> > I was able to build gnash with konqueror plugin after applying following
> > patch (warning, some linewrap is there):
>
> [patch skipped]
>
> > Trouble is, with gnash build this way I was not able to run X with KDE
> > any more - with CPU at 100 % and xorg server process consuming 98 % CPU
> > accoding to top I had basically locked console, even though I was able to
> > login via ssh and get good response for non CPU intensive command entered
> > in shell. If anybody have an idea, I can test it and report. Or maybe
> > someone else could test it too...
>
> Does X/KDE start to consume CPU right after it starts? Which exactly
> process does consume CPU? Does flipping options help (turn off media
> handlers, switch renderer to AGG)? Does standlalone player with KDE
> interface work (should be /usr/local/bin/kde-gnash)? Does GTK version cause
> any bugs?
See above - xorg server process (X itself) does consume almost all CPU. I need
to try build a test instance - my working computer has too many konqueror
windows and tabs open from the start so it is almost impossible to tell.
What do you mean by flipping options? Changing build options when building the
port? I can try it in my test instance a bit later. I did not do yet too much
checks, but I definitely will, as soom as I have simple test instance
running.
Regards,
Milan
--
No need to mail me directly. Just reply to mailing list, please.
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list