Idea about the ports tree included in the release

[Alex Dupre]

Doug Barton wrote:
> In thinking about the guy who posted to -stable about using the tar'ed
> up version of the ports tree, I had an idea that would make that more
> useful. How hard would it be to include the c[v]sup checkouts file
> with the tarball, and install it into some standard location?

And why not the portsnap database instead? It seems the
default/recommended method today.

--
Alex Dupre