Reviving a dead port

[Michaël Grünewald]

linimon at lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) writes:

>> Second, the port version I wrote is anachronic, since some people may
>> have 1.46 installed (or prior 1.45.5 version, but PORT_REVISION can be
>> used here so this is not an issue). What's the correct way (or least
>> annoyance way) to handle this backtime travel?
>
> See the description of PORTEPOCH in the Porter's Handbook:

Thank you for the hint.
-- 
Best wishes,
Michaël