first? patch [ HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing ]

[Kris Kennaway]

On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 11:53:11PM +0200, Danny Pansters wrote:
> On Saturday 12 May 2007 05:38:28 you wrote:
> > On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 04:37:17AM +0200, Danny Pansters wrote:
> > > On Saturday 12 May 2007 03:12:49 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:35:00AM +0200, Danny Pansters wrote:
> > > > > I ran into a little problem with the gstreamer-plugins, to be exact
> > > > > with the 'bad' plugin. What's in a name. Attached patch to
> > > > > gstreamer-plugins which eliminates X11BASE from configure args fixes
> > > > > it.
> > > >
> > > > This actually seems to indicate that something you have installed
> > > > references /usr/X11R6 in a .la file.  I actually built this
> > >
> > > Maybe portupgrade's backup libs?
> >
> > No, the .la files are not preserved by portupgrade.  The only files
> > that should reference this are those that are yet to be upgraded, but
> > apparently you have others that should have gone away when the ports
> > were rebuilt.
> >
> > > I know X11BASE shouldn't pose a problem but
> > > apparently it does in this case.
> >
> > It doesn't make any sense: a NOP patch cannot solve a problem :) The
> > only solution is if it's not actually a NOP because X11BASE !=
> > LOCALBASE for you, or something else changed in the meantime.
> >
> > Are you running on an older (<6.2) system?  Do you have X11R6 set in
> > your /etc/make.conf?
> >
> > Kris
> 
> Erm, I'm pretty sure that I was running this in the wrong environment :) 
> without XORG_UPGRADE set. I'm so used to using multiple consoles ...
> 
> Nonetheless removing XBASE from the gstreamer-plugin parent port did help to 
> get it to build. Not sure why though.
> 
> Sorry for late reply, just finished upgrading my meager 850 packages. Things 
> run now. 
> 
> I have a patch for x11-toolkits/py-qt (fails to build if Qt4 is (also) 
> installed) and for x11-themes/gtk-qt-engine (remove CONFIGURE_ARGS line that 
> used to be needed to get it to use X11BASE)

Again patch 2 is a NOP.  X11BASE == LOCALBASE in the new world order,
unless you have something locally going on, so I do not understand how
this is claimed to fix anything.  Please explain why it is necessary
for you :)

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20070513/c9f4d64b/attachment.pgp