make update broken

[[LoN]Kamikaze]

Erwin Lansing wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 06:47:41PM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
>> [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
>>> It still seems not to be fixed and I cannot find the PR either. Can you give me
>>> the number?
>> I didn't open a PR, I contacted directly who proposed/committed that
>> change and portmgr. But after a couple of mail exchanges nobody took a
>> final decision (i.e. I'm still waiting a reply or an action).
>>
> As I described earlier, SUP_UPDATE, CVS_UPDATE and PORTSNAP_UPDATE are
> mutually exclusive and cannot be used at the same time.  That it worked
> before was an artifact which has been fixed.  That is doesn't work
> anymore means the designed behaviour finally has been fixed and not
> broken :-)

So you cannot maintain /usr/src if you wish to use portsnap for /usr/ports? The
intended behaviour is stupid. I would prefer a fall back to portsnap if
PORTSSUPFILE is not provided.