experimental qemu-devel port update, please test!
anderson at freebsd.org
Thu Jul 12 18:30:53 UTC 2007
Craig Boston wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 12:52:52PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
>> For some reason when the ioctl is issued, curproc points to a totally
>> bogus proc structure. curthread seems to be sane as far as I can tell,
>> but the process it claims to belong to is full of junk.
> Aha! The problem isn't that curproc is garbage, but rather that it's
> being interpreted wrong.
> struct proc has some extra fields when KSE is #defined. KSE recently
> became a kernel option and was put in the DEFAULTS file, so everyone's
> kernel has it defined. But kqemu is being compiled without it.
> I compiled with -DKSE and now kqemu works!
> This seems like it would be a common problem for modules compiled
> outside the kernel tree. Is there an established way to get the
> standard configuration options?
> I'm thinking also about other options like SMP, that for instance
> changes the way mutexes work.
Great work! Thanks for chugging on it..
Do you think this could affect nvidia kernel modules? I think there was
an alternate thread about nvidia modules causing systems to panic/lock up.
More information about the freebsd-ports