How to construct this port?
kris at obsecurity.org
Thu Jan 11 15:28:39 UTC 2007
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 02:57:28PM +0200, Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:36:16 +0200
> Vasil Dimov <vd at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > Interesting:
> > <nivo+d+1167910424.4ddd7f at is-root.com>: host
> > mail.is-root.com[220.127.116.11] said: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable;
> > Client host [18.104.22.168] blocked using bg.countries.nerd.dk; Your
> > IP is in bg, rejected based on geographical location (in reply to
> > RCPT TO command)
> > Do you really block all mails coming from Bulgaria?
> Romania also.
> Dec 28 14:48:57 it postfix/smtp: 05C3A1711B: to=<nivo+sender+0820bd at is-root.com>, relay=mail.is-root.com[22.214.171.124]:25, delay=14, delays=0.2/0.15/2.6/11, dsn=5.7.1, sta
> tus=bounced (host mail.is-root.com[126.96.36.199] said: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [188.8.131.52] blocked using ro.countries.nerd.dk; Your IP is in ro, rejected b
> ased on geographical location (in reply to RCPT TO command))
> Nils, you're a port maintainer, please fix this $&^*@
> Since I saw others doing this, I'd really like a statement from portmgr
> (BCC'ed) that commiters and maintainers are not allowed to reject mail
> like this. I, for one, would commit via instant maintainer timeout to
> ports belonging this type of maintainers.
In this kind of situation I think an instant maintainer timeout is
acceptable. You have made a best effort to contact the maintainer and
they have disallowed your email by policy, indicating that they are
not interested in receiving it.
I'd say it's also grounds for replacing the maintainer by someone else
more liberal in their mail acceptance policy.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20070111/beafa822/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-ports