portaudit "forgot" 2006 vulnerabilities

Simon Barner barner at FreeBSD.org
Wed Jan 3 10:59:41 PST 2007

David Taylor wrote:
> Whilst catching up with the daily run and security run e-mails
> >from the past few days, I noticed the portaudit database was restarted
> at the beginning of the year.  Is this the expected behaviour?
> Now I still have vulnerable ports (with problems from last year which,
> until Monday, were faithfully reported to me every week), but get the
> message:
> # portaudit -Fa
> auditfile.tbz                                 100% of 5693  B   27 kBps
> New database installed.
> 0 problem(s) in your installed packages found.

Same here...
Best regards / Viele Grüße,                             barner at FreeBSD.org
 Simon Barner                                                barner at gmx.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20070103/5db975db/attachment.pgp

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list