stas at FreeBSD.org
Fri Feb 2 15:29:47 UTC 2007
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 01:10:45 -0800
Luigi Rizzo <rizzo at icir.org> mentioned:
> > Personally, I think linux-kmod-compat or linux-kmod-devkit would
> > sound better. BTW, I believe this should live in compat, not devel.
> we don't seem to have a "compat" ports category, don't we ? and i
Yeah, my fault...
> don't think this goes into the base system, or at least i don't
> have a good clue on the licensing issues yet - there are things i
> have rewritten from scratch, there are others (headers mostly, plus
> short inline functions) i just copied from GPL sources,
> and the modules themselves that you can build generally come
> from GPL sources.
Looks reasonable. Furthermore, port is much easier to maintain.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20070202/b4e0b19b/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-ports